‘I am not an Honourable Lady’: Gender and language in the National Assembly for Wales
Issue: Vol 8 No. 3 (2011)
Journal: Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice
Subject Areas: Writing and Composition Linguistics
Abstract:
Women have been historically underrepresented in political institutions and it has been claimed that it is difficult for women to succeed in the masculinist cultures that exist in political contexts. The ‘new’ devolved institutions of the UK offer opportunities to investigate gender inequality in political contexts which have a greater proportion of women members; that have included women from their inception; and that have been designed with egalitarian issues to the fore. Here, ethnographic and discourse analytic data is used to assess a senior woman’s performance in the National Assembly for Wales; to explore politicians’ appraisal of this performance; and to analyse the breakdown of the debate floor in terms of ‘rule-breaking’ activities such as barracking. In this Community of Practice (CoP), the individual’s performance draws upon communicative styles that are both stereotypically masculine (adversarial) and feminine (consensual), which can be viewed as an indication of the speaker’s competence. However, this is undermined by the speaker’s failure to adopt the correct linguistic practices for this CoP which leads to the breakdown of the formal debate discourse. Assembly Members appraise this failure negatively while also drawing upon stereotypical notions of gendered communicative norms and wider discourses of gender differentiation.
Author: Sylvia Shaw
References :
Ayala, S. P. de (2001) FTAs and Erskine May: Conflicting needs? Politeness in Question Time. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 143–169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00002-3
Bauman, R. (ed.) (1992) Folklore, Cultural Performances and Popular Entertainments. New York: Oxford University Press.
Baxter, J. (2010) The Language of Female Leadership. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Bourdieu, P. (1991) Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity and Blackwell.
Brown, A. (2005) Women and the New Scottish Parliament: Making a Difference? ESRC End of Award Report, R000223281. Swindon: ESRC. http://www.esrc.ac.uk/my-esrc/grants/R000223281/read
Brown, P. and Levinson, S. (1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Butler, J. (2004) Undoing Gender. New York: Routledge.
Cameron, D. (1997) Performing gender identity: young men’s talk and the construction of heterosexual masculinity. In S. Johnson and U. Meinhoff (eds) Language and Masculinity, 47–64. Oxford: Blackwell.
Cheney, P. (2004) The post-devolution equality agenda: The case of the Welsh assembly’s statutory duty to promote equality of opportunity. Policy and Politics 32 (1): 63–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1332/030557304772860058
Chilton, P. (2004) Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.
Coupland, N. (2007) Style: Language Variation and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511755064
Dahlerup, D. (1988) From a small to a large minority: Women in Scandinavian politics. Nordic Political Science Association 11 (4): 275-298.
Eckert, P. and McConnell-Ginet, S. (1992) Communities of Practice: Where language, gender and power all live. In K. Hall, M. Bucholtz and B. Moonwomon (eds) Locating Power: Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Women and Language Conference, 88–99. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Women and Language Group,
Edelsky, C. and Adams, K. L. (1990) Creating equality: Breaking the rules in debates. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 9 (3): 171–190.
Fetzer, A. and Bull, P. (2012) Doing leadership in political speech: Semantic processes and pragmatic inferences. Discourse and Society 23: 127–144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926511431510
Goffman, E. (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor Books.
Goffman, E. (1981) Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Harris, S. (2001) Being politically impolite: Extending politeness theory to adversarial political discourse. Discourse and Society 12 (4): 451–472. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926501012004003
Helmke, G. and Levitsky, S. (2004) Informal institutions and comparative politics: A research agenda. Perspectives on Politics 2 (4): 725–740. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1537592704040472
Holmes, J. (2006) Gendered Talk at Work. Oxford: Blackwell. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470754863
Hutchby, I. and Wooffitt, R. (1998) Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hymes, D. (1972) Models of the interaction of language and social life. In J. Gumperz and D. Hymes (eds) Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication, 35–71. Oxford: Blackwell.
Ilie, C. (2004) Insulting as (un)parliamentary practice in the British and Swedish parliaments. In P. Bayley (ed.) Cross-cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse, 45–86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kanter, R. M. (1977) Men and Women of the Corporation. New York: Basic Books.
Litosseliti, L. (2006) Gender and Language: Theory and Practice. London: Hodder and Arnold.
Mackay, F. (2004) Gender and political representation in the UK: The state of the discipline. International Journal of Politics and International Relations 6 (4): 99–120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2004.00129.x
Mackay, F., Myers, F. and Brown, A. (2003) Towards a new politics? Women and constitutional change in Scotland. In A. Dobrowolsky and V. Hart (eds) Women Making Constitutions: New Politics and Comparative Perspectives, 84–98. Basingstoke: Palgrave. Mills, S. (2003) Gender and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mills, S. (2012) Gender Matters: Feminist Linguistic Analyses. London: Equinox.
Mills, S. and Mullany, L. (2011) Language, Gender and Feminism. London: Routledge.
Mullany, L. (2007) Gendered Discourse in the Professional Workplace. Basingstoke: Palgrave. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230592902
Puwar, N. (2004) Thinking about making a difference. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 6 (1): 65–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2004.00127.x
Rampton, B. (2007) Neo-Hymsian linguistic ethnography in the United Kingdom. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11 (5): 548–607. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2007.00341.x
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A. and Jefferson, G. (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language 50: 696–735. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/412243
Sarangi, S. and Candlin, C. N. (2010) Applied linguistics and professional practice: Mapping a future agenda. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice 7 (1): 1–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1558/japl.v7i1.1
Saville-Troike, M. (1982) The Ethnography of Communication. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G. and Sacks, H. (1977) The preference for self-correction in the organisation of repair in conversation. Language 53: 361–382.
Shaw, S. (2000) Language, gender and floor apportionment in political debates. Discourse & Society 11 (3): 401–418. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926500011003006
Shaw, S. (2006) Governed by the rules? The female voice in parliamentary debates. In J. Baxter (ed.) Speaking Out: The Female Voice in Public Contexts, 81–102. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Sunderland, J. (2004) Gendered Discourses. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230505582
Thornborrow, J. (2002) Power Talk: Language and Interaction in Institutional Discourse. Harlow: Longman Pearson.
van Dijk, T. A. (2008) Discourse and Power. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
van Dijk, T. A. (2010) Political identities in parliamentary debates. In C. Ilie (ed.) European Parliaments Under Scrutiny, 29–56. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Walsh, C. (2001) Gender and Discourse: Language and Power in Politics, the Church and Organisations. London: Longman.
Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wilson, J. (1990) Politically Speaking: The Pragmatic Analysis of Political Language. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Wodak, R. (2009) The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as Usual. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230233683