References :

Aaltonen, T. and Raudaskoski, S., 2011. Storyworld evoked by hand-drawn maps. Social Semiotics, 21(2), 317-336. doi: 10.1080/10350330.2011.548652

Aaltonen, T., Arminen, I. and Raudaskoski, S. (2014). Photo sharing as a joint activity. In M. Nevile, P. Haddington, T. Heinemann, and M. Rauniomaa (Eds.), Interacting with Objects: Language, materiality, and social activity 125-144. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Antaki, C., Finlay, W. M. L. and Pate, L. 2008. Offering choice to people with an intellectural impairment: An interactional study. Journal of Intellectual Disability research, 52: 1165-1175. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2008.01101.x

Antaki, C. and Wilkinson, R. (2013). Conversation Analysis and the Study of Atypical Populations. In J. Sidnell and T. Stivers (Eds.), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis 533-550. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.

Bangerter, A. (2004). Using Pointing and Describing to Achieve Joint Focus of Attention in Dialogue. Psychological Science 15(6): 415-419. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00694.x

Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). The eye direction dector (EDD) and the shared attention mechanism (SAM): Two cases for evolutionary psychology. In C. moore and P.J. Dunham (Eds.), Joint attention: Its origin and role in development 19: 163-194.

Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Clark, H.H. 2003. Pointing and placing. In S. Kita (Ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture and cognition meet 243-268. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Clark, H.H. and Marshall, C. R. (1981). Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In A.K. Joshi, B.L. Webber, and I.A. Sag (Eds.), Elements of discourse understanding 10-63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Clarke, M. and Wilkinson, R. (2009). The collaborative construction of non-serious episodes of interaction by non-speaking children with cerebral palsy and their peers. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 23: 583-597, doi: 10.1080/02699200802491132

Collins, S., Markova, I. and Murphy, J. (1997). Bringing conversations to a close: ”The management of closings in interactions between AAC users and ’natural’ speakers. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 11: 467-493. doi: 10.3109/02699209708985208

Couper-Kuhlen, E. (1996). Intonation and clause combining in discourse: The case of because. Pragmatics 6(3): 389-426. doi: 10.1075/prag.6.3.04cou

Day, D. and Wagner, J. (2014). Objects as tools for talk. In M. Nevile, P. Haddington, T. Heinemann, and M. Rauniomaa (Eds.), Interacting with objects: Language, materiality, and social activity 101-123. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Dubois, J. W. (2007). The stance triangle. In R. Englebretson (Ed.), Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction 139-182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Laury, R., Etelämäki and Couper-Kuhlen, E. (Eds.) (2014). Approaches to Grammar for Interactional Linguistics. Pragmatics 24(3). doi: 10.1075/prag.24.3.01lau

Ford, C., Fox, B. A. and Thompson, S. A. (1996). Practices in the construction of turns: The “TCU” revisited. Pragmatics 6(3): 427-454. doi: 10.1515/CLLT.2008.003

Ford, C., Fox, B. A. and Thompson , S. (2002). Constituency and the Grammar of Turn Increments. In Cecilia E. Ford and Barbara A. Fox (Eds.), The Language of Turn and Sequence 14-38. Oxford University Press.

Goodwin, C. (2011). Contextures of Action. In J. Streeck, C. Goodwin, & C. LeBaron (Eds.), Embodied Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Goodwin, C., Goodwin, M., and Olsher, D. (2002). Producing Sense with Nonsense Syllables: Turn and Sequence in Conversations with a Man with Severe Aphasia. In Cecilia E. Ford and Barbara A. Fox (Eds.), The Language of Turn and Sequence 56-80. Oxford University Press.

Goodwin, M., Cekaite, A., and Goodwin, C. (2012). Emotion as Stance. In A. Peräkylä and M.-L. Sorjonen (Eds.), Emotion in Interaction 16-41. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Haddington, P., Mondada, L. and Nevile, M. (Eds.) (2013). Interaction and mobility: Language and the body in motion. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter.

Hanks, W. F. (1992). The indexical ground of deictic reference. In A. Duranti and C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context 43-76. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Heath, C., vom Lehn, D., Cleverly, J., and Luff, P. (2012). Revealing Surprise: The Local Ecology and the Transposition of Action. In A. Peräkylä and M.-L. Sorjonen (Eds.), Emotion in Interaction 212-234. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Helasvuo, M-L. (2010). Searching for Words: Syntactic and Sequential Construction of Word Search in Conversations of Finnish Speakers With Aphasia. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 37(1): 1-37. doi: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3701_1

Hepburn, A. and Bolden, G. (2013). The Conversation Analytic Approach to Transcription. In J. Sidnell and T. Stivers (Eds.), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis 57-76. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.

Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

Jakobson, R. 1971 [1957]. Shifters, Verbal Categories and the Russian Verb, in Selected Writings of Roman Jakobson, Vol. 2. The Hague: Mouton.

Jespersen, O. 1965[1924]. The Philosophy of Grammar. New York: W. Norton.

Keisanen, T. and Rauniomaa, M. (2012). The Organization of Participation and Contingency in Prebeginnings and Contingency in Prebeginnings of Request Sequences. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45(4): 323-351. doi: 10.1080/08351813.2012.724985

Laakso, M. (2014). Aphasia Sufferers’ Displays of Affect in Conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 47(4): 404-425. doi: 10.1080/08351813.2014.958280

Laury, R., Etelämäki, and Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2014) Approaches to grammar for interactional linguistics. Pragmatics 24(3). doi: 10.1075/prag.24.3.01lau

Levinson, S. C. (1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mondada, L., (2007). Multimodal resources for turn-taking: pointing and the emergence of possible next speakers. Discourse Studies, 9(2): 194-225. doi: 10.1177/1461445607075346

Mondada, L. and Schmitt, R. (Eds.) (2010). Situationseröffnungen: Zur mulitmodalen Herstellung fokussierter Interaktion. [Situation openings: On the multimodal accomplishment of focused interaction]. Studien zur Deutschen Sprache. Forschungen des Instituts für Detusche Sprache. Tübingen: Narr.

Nevile, M., Haddington, P., Heinemann, T. and Rauniomaa, M. (Eds.) (2014). Interacting with Objects: Language, materiality, and social activity. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Norén, N., Samuelsson, C. and Plejert, C. (Eds.) 2013. Aided Communication in Everyday Interaction. Guildford: J&R Press Ltd.

Ogiermann, E. (Ed.) (2015). Object requests: Rights and obligations surrounding objects possession and object transfer. Journal of Pragmatics 82: 1-82. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.04.001

Pomerantz. A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessment: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis 152-163. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

AUTHOR (2013). doi:

AUTHOR (2014). doi:

Rutter, B. (2009). Repair sequences in dysarthric conversational speech: A study in interactional phonetics. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 23(12): 887-900. doi: 10.3109/02699200903062303

Rutter, B. (2010). On the use of the term ‘repair’ and its application to disordered conversational speech. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders 1(2): 199-216. doi: 10.1558/jircd.v1i2.199

Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A., and Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50(4): 696-735. doi: 10.1353/lan.1974.0010

Schegloff, E. (1968). Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist 70(6): 1075-1095. doi: 10.1525/aa.1968.70.6.02a00030

Schegloff, E. (1984). On some gestures’ relation to talk. In: J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of Social Action 266-296. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schegloff, E. (1992). Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology, 97(5): 1295-1345. doi: 10.1086/229903

Schegloff, E. (2007) Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schegloff, E., Jefferson, G., and Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 53(2): 361-382. doi: 10.2307/413107
Selting, M. (1996). On the interplay of syntax and prosody in the constitution of turn-constructional units and turns in conversation. Pragmatics 6(3): 371-388. doi: 10.1075/prag.6.3.06sel

AUTHOR (2011). doi:

Stuckenbrock, A. (2014). Take the words out of my mouth: Verbal instructions as embodied practices. Journal of Pragmatics, 65: 80-102. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.017

Streeck, J., Goodwin, C. and LeBaron, C. (Eds.) (2011). Embodied Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

von Tetzchner, S. and M. H. Jensen (Eds.) (2006). Augmentative and Alternative Communication. European Perspectives. London: Whurr Publishers.

Wilkinson, R., Bloch, S. and Clarke, M. (2011). On the Use of Graphic Resources in Interaction by People with Communication Disorders. In J. Streeck, C. Goodwin and C. LeBaron (Eds.), Embodied Interaction 29-43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.