References :

Auer, P. and Hörmeyer, I. (2017). Achieving intersubjectivity in augmented and alternative communication (AAC): Intercorporeal, embodied and disembodied practices. In C. Meyer, J. Streeck, and S. Jordan (Eds), Intercorporeality. Emerging Socialities in Interaction, 323–360. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190210465.003.0013

Batorowicz, B., Campbell, F., von Tetzchner, S., King, G., and Missiuna, C. (2014). Social participation of school-aged children who use communication aids: The views of children and parents. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 30: 237–251. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2014.940464

Binger, C. and Light, J. (2008). The morphology and syntax of individuals who use AAC: Research review and implications for effective practice. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 24: 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610701830587

Bloch, S. (2005). Coconstructing meaning in acquired speech disorders: Word and letter repetition in the construction of turns. In K. Richards and P. Seedhouse (Eds), Applying Conversation Analysis, 38–55. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230287853_3

Clark, H. and Brennan, S. (1991). Grounding in communication. Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition 13: 127–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/10096-006

Clarke, M. and Wilkinson, R. (2013). Communicative competence in children`s peer interaction. In N. Norén, C. Samuelsson, and C. Plejert (Eds), Aided Communication in Everyday Interaction 23–57. Guildford: J&R Press Ltd.

Clarke, M., Bloch, S., and Wilkinson, R. (2013). Speaker transfer in children’s peer conversation: Completing communication-aid-mediated contributions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 29: 37–53. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2013.767490

Clarke, M. and Kirton, A. (2003). Patterns of interaction between children with physical disabilities using augmentative and alternative communication systems and their peers. Child Language Teaching & Therapy 19: 135–151. https://doi.org/10.1191/0265659003ct248oa

Drew, P. and Heritage, J. (1992). Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Enfield, N. J. (2013). Relationship Thinking: Agency, Enchrony, and Human Sociality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199338733.001.0001

Ferm, U., Ahlsen, E. and Bjorck-Åkesson, E. (2013). Spontaneous communication with blisssymbolics between mother and her daughter at home: What do they talk about and how? In N. Norén, C. Samuelsson, and C. Plejert (Eds), Aided Communication in Everyday Interaction, 281–314. Guildford: J&R Press Ltd.

Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of Talk. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1489–1522. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00096-X

Heath, C. and Luff, P. (2013). Embodied action and organizational activity. In J. Sidnell and T. Stivers (Eds), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis 283–306. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch14

Hedvall, P. and Rydeman, B. (2010). An activity systemic approach to augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative & Alternative Communication 26: 230–241. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2010.528795

Hidecker, M. J. C., Paneth, N., Rosenbaum, P. L., Kent, R. D., Lillie, J., Eulenberg, J. B., Chester, K, Johnson, B, Evatt, M., and Taylor, K. (2011). Developing and validating the communication function classification system for individuals with cerebral palsy. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology 53: 704–710. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2011.03996.x

Higginbotham, D. J. and Wilkins, D. P. (1999). Slipping through the timestream: Social issues of time and timing in augmented interactions. In D. Kovarsky, M. Maxwell, and J. F. Duchan (Eds), Constructing (In)competence: Disabling Evaluations in Clinical and Social Interaction 2: 49–82. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Iwasaki, S. (2011). The multimodal mechanics of collaborative unit construction in Japanese conversation. In J. Streeck, C. Goodwin, and C. LeBaron (Eds), Embodied Interaction: Language and the Body in the Material World, 106–120. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Koivunen, A. (2012). Kommunikointikansio keskustelutilanteessa: Apuvälineen ja kumppanin toiminnan tarkastelua. [Interaction by means of a dynamic communication book – A look at the communication aid and the communication partner]. Master’s thesis. Retrieved from https://helda.helsinki.fi/handle/10138/235815

Levinson, S. C. (2013). Action formation and ascription. In J. Sidnell and T. Stivers (Eds), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, 103–130. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch6

Lloyd, L. and Blischak, D. (1992). AAC terminology policy and issues update. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 8 (2): 104–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434619212331276153

Mondada, L. (2014). The local constitution of multimodal resources for social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 65: 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.04.004

Nevile, M. (2015). The embodied turn in research on language and social interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 48: 121–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2015.1025499

Norén, N., Samuelsson, C. and Plejert, C. (2013). Dialogical perspectives on aided communication. In N. Norén, C. Samuelsson, and C. Plejert (Eds), Aided Communication in Everyday Interaction, 1–22. Guildford: J&R Press Ltd.

Norén, N. and Sigurd Pilesjö, M. (2016). Supporting a child with multiple disabilities to participate in social interaction: The case of asking a question. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 30: 790–811. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699206.2016.1213883

Norén, N., Svensson, E., and Telford, J. (2013). Participants’ dynamic orientation to folder navigation when using a VOCA with a touch screen in talk-in-interaction. Augmentative & Alternative Communication 29: 20–36. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2013.767555

Robillard, A. (1994). Communication problems in the intensive care unit. Qualitative Sociology 17: 383–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393337

Ruusuvuori, J. (2013). Emotion, affect and conversation. In J. Sidnell and T. Stivers (Eds), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, 330–349. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch16

Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., and Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50: 696–735. https://doi.org/10.2307/412243

Savolainen, I., Klippi, A., Tykkyläinen, T., Higginbotham J., and Launonen, K. (2020). The structure of participants’ turn-transition practices in aided conversations that use speech-output technologies, Augmentative and Alternative Communication. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/07434618.2019.1698654

Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence Organization in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208

Sidnell, J. (2013). Basic conversation analytic methods. In J. Sidnell and T. Stivers (Eds), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, 77–100. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch5

Sigurd Pilesjö, M. (2013). On the use of bodily action and vocalizations as resources and methods when claiming and completing turns in aided interaction. In N. Norén, C. Samuelsson, and C. Plejert (Eds), Aided Communication in Everyday Interaction, 1–22. Guildford: J&R Press Ltd.

Sigurd Pilesjö, M. and Norén, N. (2017). Teaching communication aid use in everyday conversation. Child Language Teaching and Therapy 33: 241–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265659017702204

Sigurd Pilesjö, M. and Rasmussen, G. (2011). Exploring interaction between a non-speaking boy using aided AAC and his everyday communication partners: Features of turn organizing and turn design. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders 2: 183–213. https://doi.org/10.1558/jircd.v2i2.183

Stevanovic, M. and Peräkylä, A. (2012). Deontic authority in interaction: The right to announce, propose, and decide. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45: 297–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.699260

Stevanovic, M. and Weiste, E. (2017). Conversation-analytic data session as a pedagogical institution. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 15: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.06.001

Stivers, T. and Sidnell, J. (2005). Introduction: Multimodal interaction. Semiotica 156: 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2005.2005.156.1

Sundqvist, A., Plejert, C., and Ronnberg, J. (2010). The role of active participation in interaction for children who use augmentative and alternative communication. Communication & Medicine 7: 165–175. https://doi.org/10.1558/cam.v7i2.165

Todman, J., Alm, N., Higginbotham, J., and File, P. (2008). Whole utterance approaches in AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 24: 235–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/08990220802388271

Trevarthen, C. and Aitken, K. J. (2001). Infant intersubjectivity: Research, theory, and clinical applications. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines 42: 3–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00701

VISK = Auli Hakulinen, Maria Vilkuna, Riitta Korhonen, Vesa Koivisto, Tarja Riitta Heinonen, and Irja Alho. (2004). Iso suomen kielioppi. [Big Finnish Grammar] Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura. Retrieved from: http://scripta.kotus.fi/visk 12.3.2018

von Tetzchner, S. and Martinsen, H. (1996). Words and strategies: Conversations with young children who use aided language. In S. von Tetzchner and H. Jensen (Eds), Augmentative and Alternative Communication: European Perspectives, 65–88. London: Whurr.